皇冠最新登录(www.huangguan.us)提供新2网址和新2最新网址,包括新2手机网址,新2备用网址,皇冠最新网址,新2足球网址,皇冠新2网址,新2管理网址,新2网址大全,皇冠手机网址,皇冠手机会员端,皇冠手机管理端,皇冠足球网址.

首页体育正文

最新博彩网址(www.99cx.vip)_Judge delays decision on Latif corruption charges

admin2022-06-2719

最新博彩网「wang」址www.99cx.vip)是一个开放皇冠体育网 wang[址代理APP下载、皇冠〖guan〗体育{yu}网址会员APP下载 zai[、皇冠体育网址线路APP下【xia】载、皇冠体育网址登『deng』录APP下载的官方平台。最新博彩网址上 shang[线上最{zui}新博彩网址会员登录〖lu〗线路、最新博‘bo’彩网“wang”址〖zhi〗代(dai)理网址更新最『zui』快。最《zui》新博彩{cai}网址开放皇冠‘guan’官方会员注册、皇冠官方代理 li[开户等业务「wu」。

,

THE Sessions Court in Johor Baru today postponed decision on the case against former Johor executive councillor Abd Latif Bandi, his son, and a real estate consultant, who are facing 37 charges of corruption and money laundering over RM35.7 million.

Judge Kamarudin Kamsun, who was scheduled to deliver the verdict today, said there were still some arguments that needed to be submitted by parties involved and he would then rule on August 7.

“I need to listen to those arguments before making a decision. So, I can’t do it today, hence, a new date will be set,” he said.

Lawyer Salehuddin Saidin, represented Latif, 56, and his son, Ahmad Fauzan Hatim, 30, then applied for the court to hear the submission by the defence.

During the proceedings, the court heard submissions by the prosecution, represented by Deputy Director I, legal and prosecution division of the Malaysian Anti -Corruption Commission (MACC) Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin, and assisted by deputy public prosecutors Ahmad Akram Gharib and Mahadi Abdul Jumaat.

On June 14, 2017, Latif, Ahmad Fauzan and Amir Shariffuddin Abd Raub, 49, were charged with 33 counts of corruption and four counts of money laundering for a total of RM35.7 million, and they pleaded not guilty to all charges.

On April 21, 2019, Kamarudin acquitted and discharged the three of them of the 37 charges after finding the prosecution having failed to prove its case.

However, on November 7, 2021, the High Court ordered the former chairman of the state housing and local government committee and his co-defendants to enter their defence, after it overturned the Sessions Court verdict.

On the corruption charges, the three men are charged under section 28 (1) (C) of the MACC Act 2009, read together with section 16 (a) (B) of the same act.

They were also charged under section 32 (8) (c) and section 89 of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti -Terrori *** Financing and Proceeds from Unlawful Activities (AMLA) Act 2001. – Bernama, June 26, 2022.


转载说明:本文转 zhuan[载自Sunbet。

网友评论

最新评论